🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate atomic talks with Washington as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had originated from mediators to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Course

Araghchi is treading a difficult path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient in military terms and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president claiming the sites had been destroyed. Subsequently, European countries employed their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that American atomic experts could work on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted three times they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in some form if talks restart.

The American leader in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to resume discussions, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be settled by combat operations. He asserted the assaults began with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust hard to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had always attempted to enforce their demands during the discussions. Negotiations can still be alive and stays the ultimate solution to address conflicts, but its standards, regulations and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will receive a reply in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is important is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have developed stronger, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the face of this assault."