🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Over System & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach only to fire him for using excessively that system. Hire the project manager and later discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.